Is our educational philosophy sustainable?
COMMENT | I recently came across a recording of a retired principal, V Chakaravathy, ranting at the reigning tsar of the education regime Maszlee Malik in a dialogue session organised by the Asian Strategy and Learning Institute (Asli) in Subang Jaya.
The arguments took me back to my schooldays in Sekolah Temenggong Abdul Rahman I (Star 1) in Johor Bahru, back in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Listening to the principal having a go at the minister reminded me of Star 1's own principal PV Kulasingam. This no-nonsense educator was much feared. He had a stable of teachers of various cultural backgrounds.
I still remember the name of those great educators of my life and times, D Varma, Wong Seng Kuang, Ho Liang Kho, Elizabeth Tan, Cikgu Hasan. I remember the name of the office boy as well, Pakcik Seman.
That was the time of tuck shops, sepak yem, bola chopping, and only prefects wearing ties. The 'tablet' was not an iPad, and learning was fun in a school where English was the medium of instruction.
I did not remember much homework given to be completed at home under the light of my kerosene lamp, since I could still play soccer to my heart’s content every evening after school.
I could still roam around my village after school, playing in the nearby stream to catch fish and grasshoppers, roll old bicycle tyres around the neighbourhood, or walk along the huge water pipes that sent refined water to Singapore, and I could still watch my black-and-white American and Malay TV programmes, the two channels in Malaysia and two more from Singapore.
In school were the basics of reading, writing, counting, and speaking taught with not much stress, as I recall. I thank the universe the internet, iPhone and all other kinds of dehumanising and life-distracting gadgets had not been invented yet.
I could relate to what Chakaravathy was saying on the topic of how today’s children are experiencing a slow but sure death of creativity and problem-solving.
I lamented on the state of our country on Facebook recently:
How can this happen?
How can
A country even begins to learn about the ethics
Of sustainability...
What we really need is a PM transition timetable to put an end to all forms of political conspiracy, and once we have a stable government, Anwar can rightfully appoint the best people for the jobs. Right now, things are in a sad state of flux because we don’t know what’s going to happen next. Will a syllabus revamp still be relevant in a year’s time? Will our foreign policy still hold after that time? What does it mean if Tun’s term is extended beyond 2 years? People can hold their breath, but only long enough for Harapan to get its act together. They cannot hold their breath for two years. By the end of two years, given the uncertainty, there’s going to be a lot of economical and political carnage. I am appalled that some people are entertaining the idea that Anwar should not be PM. If he is not, who then? Those ideas are nothing more than cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face. 1MDB fiasco is gong to take more than 2 years to solve. For the sake of Tun, and for the sake of Malaysia, the transition should happen sooner than later. There’s no need to wait for Najib to be convicted. We need a reset and a clearer direction.
Report this comment
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
This action cannot be undone.